Педагогические науки
Исследование эйблизма и инвалидности в арт-педагогике / Ableism and disability studies in art pedagogy
- Информация о материале
- Опубликовано: 18 октября 2016
- Просмотров: 1612
Васильева Татьяна Павловна / Vasilyeva Tatiana ˗ студент, кафедра педагогики и психологии девиантного поведения, факультет педагогики, психологии и коммуникативистики;
Волкодав Татьяна Владимировна / Volkodav Tatiana – кандидат филологических наук, доцент, кафедра английской филологии, кафедра педагогики и психологии, магистр, направление: психолого-педагогическое образование, действительный член Международной Академии гуманизации образования, Кубанский государственный университет, г. Краснодар
Аннотация: данная статья рассматривает проблему эйблизма на примере педагогического исследования университета штата Канзас. Целью работы является популяризация педагогического исследования инвалидности в учебных программах, для создания междисциплинарных знаний в области инвалидности; распространение движений в защиту прав инвалидов; формирование более сложного, объективного, критически отрефлексированного, обдуманного освещения проблем людей с ограниченными возможностями в искусстве, телевидении, в кино, рекламе, медиа-искусстве и т.д.; знакомство людей с социально-культурными аспектами инвалидности.
Abstract: the article examines the problem of ablismin the research of Kansas University in order to promote the disability studies in the curriculum to enhance transdisciplinary knowledge of disability, socio-cultural aspects of disabilityand the rights of the disabled, including more complex, objective and critical considerations on the problems of the disabled reflected in art, television, films, advertising, media arts, etc.
Ключевые слова: инвалидность, исследуемая арт-педагогами; педагогическое исследование; конституционного разрыва между понятием способности/неспособности; план урока; эйблизм; инвалидность; безинвалидный; дискриминация.
Keywords: Disability Studies Art Education, pedagogical research, able/not able constitutional divide, lesson plan, ablism, disability, non disabled, discrimination.
Литература
1. Antonak R. F. & Livneh H. (1988). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities: Methods, psychometrics and scales. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
2. Brookfield S. D. & Preskill S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for dramatic classrooms (2nd ed.). San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Brown S. C. (2001). Methodological paradigms that shape disability research. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman & M. Bury (Eds.). Handbook of disability studies (pp. 145-170). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
4. Campbell F. K. (2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. New York. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Derby J. (2011). Disability studies and art education. Studies in Art Education. 52 (2). 94–111.
6. Derby J. (2012). Art education and disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly. 32 (1). [Electronic resource]. URL: http:// dsq-sds.org/article/view/3027/3054/ (дата обращения 22.10.2016).
7. Derby J. (2013a). Accidents happen: An art autopathography on mental disability. Disability Studies Quarterly. 33 (1). [Electronic resource]. URL: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3441/3201/ (дата обращения 22.10.2016).
8. Derby J. (2013b). Nothing about us without us: Art education’s disservice to disabled people [Commentary]. Studies in Art Education. 54 (4). 376–380.
9. Derby J. (2014a). Animality–patriarchy in mental disability representations. Visual Culture&Gender. 9, 18 –30. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://vcg.emitto.net/9vol/Derby.pdf/ (дата обращения 22.10.2016).
10. Derby J. (2014b). Violent video games and the military: Recruitment, training, and treating mental disability. Art Education. 67 (3). 19–25.
11. Derby J. (2015). Disability Studies pedagogy in the Art Education curriculum: A U.S. example. In M. Kallio-Tavin & J. Pullinen (Eds.), Conversations on Finnish art education (pp. 48-61). Helsinki. Finland: Aalto University.
12. Derby J. & Karr V. (2015). A collaborative Disability Studies-based undergraduate art project at two universities. Disability Studies Quarterly. 35 (2). [Electronic resource]. URL: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4643/3943/ (дата обращения 22.10.2016).
13. Derby John. Copyright 2016 by the National Art Education Association Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research 2016. 57 (2). 102–119 DOI: 10.1080/00393541.2016.1133191.
14. Eisenhauer J. (2007). Just looking and staring back: Challenging ableism through disability performance art. Studies in Art Education. 49 (1). 7–22.
15. Eisenhauer J. (2008). A visual culture of stigma: Critically examining representations of mental illness. Art Education. 61 (5). 13–18.
16. Eisenhauer J. (2009). Admission: Madness and (be)coming out within and through spaces of confinement. Disability Studies Quarterly. 29 (3). [Electronic resource]. URL: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/939/1112/ (дата обращения 22.10.2016).
17. Eisenhauer J. (2010a). “Bipolar makes me a bad mother”: A performative dialogue about representations of motherhood. Visual Culture & Gender. 5. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://explorations.sva.psu.edu/vcg/ (дата обращения 22.10.2016).
18. Eisenhauer J. (2010b). Writing Dora: Creating community through autobiographical zines about mental illness. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education. 28, 25 –38.
19. Eisenhauer J. (2012). My bipolar body. Disability Studies Quarterly. 32(3). [Electronic resource]. URL: http://dsq-sds.org/ article/view/3250/3098/ (дата обращения 22.10.2016).
20. Hockenberry J. (2008). From Public transit. In C. Lewiecki-Wilson & B. J. Brueggemann (Eds.), Disability and the teaching of writing: A critical sourcebook (pp. 257–261). Boston. MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
21. Hulgin K. M., O’Connor S., Fitch E. F. & Gutsell M. (2011). Disability studies pedagogy: Engaging dissonance and meaning making. Review of Disability Studies. 7(3–4). 52–66.
22. Kallio-Tavin M. (2013). Encountering self, other, and the third: Researching the crossroads of art pedagogy, Levinasian ethics and disability studies (Doctoral dissertation). Helsinki. Finland: Aalto University.
23. Kornasky L. (2009, March 17). Identity politics and invisible disability in the classroom. Inside Higher Ed. [Electronic resource]. URL: www.insidehighered.com/views/2009/03/17/kornasky/ (дата обращения 22.10.2016).
24. Kraft M. & Keifer-Boyd K. (2013). Including difference: A communitarian approach to art education in the least restrictive environment. Reston. VA: National Art Education Association.
25. Latour B. (1993). We have never been modern. (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Price M. (2011). Mad at school: Rhetorics of mental disability and academic life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
27. Richardson J. & Eisenhauer J. (2014). Dr. Phil, medical theaters, freak shows, and talking couches: The talking stage as pedagogical site. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies. 8 (1). 67–80.
28. Samuels E. J. (2003). My body, my closet: Invisible disability and the limits of coming-out discourse. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies. 9 (1–2), 233–255.
29. Shakespeare T. (1999). The sexual politics of disabled masculinity. Sexuality and Disability. 17 (1), 94–113. doi:10.1023/A:10213829826.
30. Shuttleworth R. Wedgwood N. & Wilson N. J. (2012). The dilemma of disabled masculinity. Men and Masculinities. 15 (2). 174–194. doi:10.1177/1097184X12439879.
31. Siebers T. (2008). Disability theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
32. Stringer E. (2008). Action research in education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
33. Thomson R. G. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
34. Walker S. R. (2001). Teaching meaning in artmaking. Worcester. MA: Davis Publications.
35. Wexler A. (2011). “The siege of the cultural city is underway”: Adolescents with developmental disabilities make “art”. Studies in Art Education. 53 (1), 53–70.
36. Wexler A. & Derby J. (2015). Art in institutions: The emergence of (disabled) outsiders. Studies in Art Education. 56 (1). 127–141.
37. Wilson D. J. (2004). Fighting polio like a man: Intersections of masculinity, disability, and aging. In B. G. Smith & B. Hutchison (Eds.), Gendering disability (pp. 119-133). New Brunswick. NJ: Rutgers University Press.
38. Yuker H. E., Block J. R. & Younng J. H. (1970). The measurement of attitudes toward disabled persons [Monograph]. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://eric.ed.gov/ (дата обращения 22.10.2016).
Поделитесь данной статьей, повысьте свой научный статус в социальных сетях
| Tweet |
